Blake Evertsen: Examining Silence and Accountability in Unresolved Financial Disputes | DisputeVoice

Follow this link for more detailed and compelling evidence about this case: https://disputevoice.com/evidence-archive-my-dispute-with-blake-evertsen-abbas-boudreau/

Theory One: A Troubling Pattern That Suggests Evasion

• Investors are invited to fund Amazon stores, bulk product deals, or access to capital.
• Significant sums are collected, under promises of convenience, growth, and passive income.
• But instead of strictly using those funds for investors’ benefit, some of the money is quietly redirected—possibly to personal projects, real estate, or operational expenses.
• When investors express concern, small repayments or vague explanations are offered—just enough to keep people calm, but not enough to restore trust.

Theory Two: A Business Setback That Triggered Desperation—and Silence

Jo Anna Browning’s Case: Another Example of Head-in-the-Sand Behavior

My concerns deepened after learning about Jo Anna Browning’s lawsuit, which details eerily similar issues involving the same individuals and companies—especially Evertsen Equity.

Browning alleges she authorized an $11,000 charge related to her Amazon store. Instead, Evertsen Equity processed $12,250—an overcharge she never approved.

“Ms. Browning was upset… as she did not give [Eyad Abbas] permission to charge Twelve Thousand Two-Hundred Fifty dollars… she only authorized Eleven Thousand Dollars… and no more.”
— Browning Lawsuit

Again, when confronted, instead of clear answers—more silence. More avoidance. More heads in the sand.

Why was Evertsen Equity, a funding company, handling charges for Amazon store products? Could this tie back to the same product crisis that affected my situation? I don’t claim to know for sure—but these are fair questions that deserve answers.

The Federal RICO Lawsuit: A Sandstorm of Allegations

Most concerning is the federal RICO lawsuit filed by Randy Martono-Chai, naming:

• Blake Evertsen
• Evertsen Equity
• Eyad Abbas
• Kevin Vieira
• Empower Consulting Group, LLC
• Onyx Ecom

• Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
• Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 — Racketeering (RICO) Act
• Case Number: 2:2025cv00662
• Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
• Filed: April 5, 2025

The case makes serious allegations of coordinated financial misconduct. I am not drawing legal conclusions from this case—but its existence adds to my unease and reinforces why I believe these unanswered questions are worth raising publicly.

Blake Evertsen Is Responsible—The Sand Can’t Hide the Debt

Regardless of these theories, one fact is clear: Blake Evertsen, through Evertsen Equity, accepted $135,494.99 of my money. Despite months of opportunity to resolve this amicably, I’ve received no refund, no documentation, and no explanation.

I had been willing to forgo interest to encourage a fair settlement. That offer has expired. His silence has now become expensive:

• Total Interest Due (November 17, 2023 – June 25, 2025): $42,691.59
• Daily Interest Increase: $74.23

I am publicly demanding that Blake Evertsen repay this debt in full, including all accrued interest.

Final Thoughts: The Ostrich Theories Explain the Silence—But They Don’t Excuse It

These theories are not accusations—they’re plausible explanations based on public records, my firsthand experience, and a troubling pattern of avoidance.

I believe other investors deserve transparency—not evasiveness. We deserve answers, not more heads buried in the sand

If Blake Evertsen, Evertsen Equity, or others wish to provide documentation, clarification, or a public response, I will publish their statements unedited—provided they contain verifiable facts addressing these concerns.

Until then, the theories stand as the only explanations we’ve been left with.

Closing Disclaimer:

Everything shared here is based on my personal experience, public records, and unanswered questions. I do not claim to know every detail, and I welcome clarification. If Blake Evertsen, Evertsen Equity, Eyad Abbas, Dustin Boudreau, or their representatives wish to provide documented evidence, transaction records, or a clear, verifiable explanation, I will publish it unedited, exactly as they submit it. But unless and until they do—and unless the outstanding amounts are paid in full—the situation remains unresolved. That includes the full $328,494.95 owed to me, with $135,494.99 plus interest directly tied to Evertsen Equity and Blake Evertsen, which I continue to demand in full.