Menu

File An IC3 With The FBI To Report Blake Evertsen, Eyad Abbas, and Dustin Heinrich Boudreau

Victim Invitation & Filing Campaign

If you believe you’ve been scammed by Blake Evertsen, Eyad Abbas, Dustin Heinrich Boudreau, Empower Consulting Group LLC, Empower Cosmetics LLC, or Evertsen Equity LLC, we want to hear from you.

👉 Please submit your story, evidence, and details through our confidential intake form here:
DisputeVoice Intake Form – Submit Your Case

Do not file your IC3 complaint yet. We are first verifying and organizing at least 20 victims before filing together to maximize impact. Once we reach that number, we’ll release filing instructions, provide a model wording kit, and set a coordinated timeline. Your submission will remain confidential and used solely for this campaign to hold these individuals accountable.

How This Works (Skimmable Summary)

  • Do not file your IC3 report yet. Wait until we have 20 verified victims — filing together in a short window creates a stronger pattern the FBI cannot ignore.
  • We are building a secure victim network. Each participant will share contact info, amount lost, the individuals/companies involved, and available evidence through our intake form.
  • All IC3 reports will use consistent identifiers. Everyone will reference Blake Evertsen, Eyad Abbas, Dustin Heinrich Boudreau, Empower Consulting Group LLC, Empower Cosmetics LLC, and Evertsen Equity LLC so IC3 links the complaints.
  • You will receive a “Victim Filing Kit.” This includes step-by-step IC3 instructions, model wording, and a checklist of evidence (contracts, payment records, texts, emails, ads).
  • After filing, we will push for action. We’ll collect IC3 confirmation numbers, compile a summary package for the FBI, state attorneys general, and the media, and apply public pressure to ensure the case cannot be ignored.

The Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) is the FBI’s intake system for internet fraud complaints. Every submission is logged into their database and categorized.

  • IC3 does not guarantee the investigation of every report. Instead, they look for patterns, scale, and credible evidence. If they see the same names, companies, and fraud methods coming up repeatedly across different victims, that raises the likelihood of action.
  • They also coordinate with the FTC, state attorneys general, and local law enforcement, so your reports can create a trail that multiple agencies see.

How Many Reports Matter?

  • There isn’t a published “magic number,” but from experience:
    • A handful (5–10): Likely won’t trigger an investigation unless the dollar amounts are huge or there’s strong interstate evidence.
    • Dozens (20–50): This is where patterns stand out in IC3’s database. If you all use the same names (Evertsen, Abbas, Boudreau, etc.), company names (Empower Consulting, Evertsen Equity), and describe similar fraud methods, the FBI is more likely to notice.
    • Hundreds: Very hard for the FBI to ignore, especially if the losses collectively reach into the millions. That’s when you see dedicated task forces formed.

What Increases the Odds

  1. Consistency: Every victim needs to clearly name the same individuals/companies in their reports.
  2. Evidence: Attach contracts, bank records, wire transfers, text/email logs. IC3 complaints with supporting documentation are weighted more heavily.
  3. Dollar Amount: The higher the aggregate losses (say, millions across 20+ victims), the stronger the case.
  4. Pressure: Once filed, organized victims can collectively follow up with their state representatives, senators, or the media. Public pressure sometimes helps move cases from the “database” stage to the “investigation” stage.

Realistic Expectation

  • With 20 solid, well-documented victims, you have a chance of getting noticed, especially if the total losses are in the mid-to-high six figures or more.
  • With 50–100 victims telling a consistent story, the FBI will almost certainly open at least a preliminary investigation.

👉 In other words, it’s not just the number of people, it’s the combined dollar loss, pattern of fraud, and quality of evidence that drive outcomes.